Reverse Lifecycle Management (RLM) provides integrated, end-to-end functionality for the management and control and execution of reverse logistics transactions. The feature functionality in an RLM system enables the automation of key processes and tracking of critical data related to returns, warranty, inventory, transportation, shop floor control, etc. As the acronym implies, RLM supports the lifecycle of a reverse logistics transaction
An Reverse Logistics operartion can realize a number of quantifiable benefits by implementing an RLM solution. These benefits include but are not limited to:
- Cost reduction through better utilization and planning of assets and resources. This is brought about through visibility and planning tools.
- Administration consolidation through reduction of touch points which can be achieved through the integration capabilities, business rule work flows, and standardized management reports found within an RLM solution.
- Protected revenue and income recognized when companies better understand how much revenue and income associated with Aftermarket Service is at risk in the RLSC. This is achieved through the implementation of better controls found within end-to-end functionality and continuous monitoring of RL events (e.g., recall, returns, and warranty service).
- Liability protection: Many companies in diverse industries are susceptible and exposed to legal and regulatory action due to environmental and governmental regulations. The tracking and tracing features within an RLM provide up-to-date, real time information on the disposition of every item within the RLSC.
- Resource optimization: Inventory, transportation assets, employee allocation, and other resources are wasted on improper RL practices. Through business rules and better data, an RLM helps to conserve and manage a company’s resources.
- Productivity and efficiency gains: Poor RL processes take too much time resulting in poor customer satisfaction and wasted money. RLM streamlines and optimizes RL process time through standardized processes and procedures.
- Customer experience improvement: OEMs, 3PLs, Carriers, and Retailers can dramatically improve customer satisfaction through the implementation of self monitoring reverse logistics processes and systems. Refined business practices, such as issuing proper credit for returns, fast turnaround on sending products back to customers, balanced books, and issuing replacements are some crucial and improved processes that are automated by a state of the art RLM solution.
- IT resource reduction: By deploying an RLM on a SaaS platform, multiple instances and replication of expensive hardware and its maintenance are eliminated. The time to deploy the standardized SaaS RLM platform allows for any location to be ready in hours, not weeks or months.
These benefits help an RL operation achieve a best in class standard level of performance. The benefits can in turn be measured in terms of improved operational metrics such as:
- SLA compliance
- Repair Turnaround Time (TAT)
- Cycle Times
- Output Yield
- Quality Levels
- Repeat Failures
In turn, these improvements in operational performance can be monetized directly in the form of cost savings, productivity gains, revenue gains, and improved cash flow. Clearly, the implementation of an RLM will produce a significant ROI that justifies the business case and results in higher gross margins and reduced operating costs, not to mention improved quality levels and customer satisfaction. As such, RLM offers a strategic framework for transforming a Reverse Logistics operation jnto a strategic profit center.
To learn more about the benefits of RLM and how to acheive them in your organizations click here.
As many of you know, I recently authored a white paper titled Reverse Lifecycle Management: The Next Opportunity in Reverse Logistics. I received a lot of favorable comments from people who took the time to download and read the article. Thank’s so much . There were, or course, a few readers who expressed words of caution about the promise of the Reverse Life-cycle Management (RLM) concepts discussed in the paper. One person commented that an optimal RLM system based on best practices might be a good idea but without good project management and a willingness by the client to re-engineer some business processes the best solution can easily turn into a nightmare. Another person expressed concern about the quality of data being captured by the system. Their view was that a RLM solution may be world class but if it doesn’t collect that right data to improve operating effeciency and productivity or product performance, then it is useless.
Well, I couldn’t agree any stronger. Good project management and executive level buy-in are critical to a successful RLM implementation. I would say these components are important to any type of initiative that involves change. This is also true with respect to caputuring good, useful and reliable data as expressed by the old adage… “garbage in/garbage out”. RLM must consider the needs are all stakeholders, and that is an important distinction and decision that designers of a RLM solution need to take into account. Who are the stake-holders? Where do they fit in? What is their relationship? Where to they have an impact? These are are questions that must be answered when determining what type of data needs to be captured in the RLM solution.
One of the greatest benefits of RLM, and there are many, is that it provides a systemic platform for capturing, managing, analyzing and disseminating critical business intelligence necessary for optimizing an Reverse Logistics Operation regardless of the end-user's demographics (i.e., years in business, number of employees, market served, number of customers, type of business, etc.). Basically, RLM is a strategic framework for defining system functional requirements. Our view, which is supported by very extensive market research is that the current R.L. systemic infrastructures of most OEMs/3PSPs/Retailers/etc. are very fragmented and lack critical feature functionality for capturing critical data about the R.L. Supply Chain. Up until now, RL Supply Chain professionals have not had many available options for resolving systemic issues such as data accuracy, visibility, root cause analysis, etc. Instead, these professionals have had to either ignore the situation, create workarounds, or use brute force to resolve problems as they occurred. This in turn has had negative consequences on operating costs, personnel productivity, and the overall customer experience.
RLM is a new industry standard and will help entrenched management mitigate and avoid the above challenges by helping them to anticipate, plan, and monitor RL events. I hope you will see the value of the RLM concept. Please share with me you thoughts, comments, and criticisms so that we may continue to build awareness of the challenges and potential solutions to Reverse Life-cycle Management.
I have been following a number of discussions on LinkedIn related to the definition of exceptional service within the Aftermarket. Most of the comments take the view that front line service personnel are the key to exceptional service and that these people should be trained to delivery service with a smile, have concern for the customer, and have authority and responsibility for front line decision making. These comments suggest to me that a “warm and fuzzy” disposition is all that is needed to ensure exceptional service.
The cold and hard truth is that exceptional service involves so much more. There is no doubt in my mind that all employees, from the CEO to the front line worker, are critical to the success of any business and that customers love it when service is provided to them by someone with a smile, a warm heart, and empathic ear. However, I can think of countless times when I've seen businesses who offered horrible service in terms of timeliness, accuracy, consistency, etc. while losing money hand over first even though they empowered their front-line employees and trained them with good people skills.
To me, exceptional service means to know what the customer wants and deliver it on time, every time on a consistent, predictable, and repetitive basis. It is the role of a Service Executive to understand and deliver extra-ordinary services. The key to extra-ordinary service is to define the tangible aspects of service from the customers' perspective (That's Market Research 101). In essence, define what the customer’s expectation is in terms of time, accuracy, and availability. Obviously this may differ from industry to industry and/or segment to segment. That’s why market research is so important.
Next, have a system and processes in place to deliver service on a consistent and repetitive basis. Obviously, we will want to train all employees on these processes. Exceptional service also requires you establish a problem-resolution process to account for mistakes/error as they will happen; we are only human and nothing is “fail safe”. Last but not least, measure performance and improve where needed. Make sure everyone from the CEO to the front line worker knows what the metrics are. Continuously ask the customers for feedback on how to better meet their needs and proactively offer solutions which you've identified through your knowledge management process.
In summary, the cold, hard truth is that exceptional service is not only about people and communication, but about data, technology, and processes. State of the art service management solutions, collaborative computing platforms, mobility solutions, analytics and other related technology make it possible for any company to create an environment where every employee, from the CEO to front-line, can deliver exceptional services.
To learn more about the cold, hard truth of exceptional service and how your company can deliver it too visit our website www.blumberg-advisor.com or contact us at 215-643-9060.
“A day will come when customers will evaluate our service business based on the capabilities of our Service Management System”. I remember this statement as clear as day. It was from a participant, a VP of Service & Support, in a focus group that I moderated for a client over 15 years ago. We were working with them to launch what was at the time considered to be cutting edge technology…a Field Service Mobility solution. This executive’s statement helped to validate our assessment of the market opportunity for our client. It also represented a mind-shift in the conventional wisdom toward the use of technology in delivering aftermarket services. Up until this point, service businesses were valued based on the technical expertise of the service personnel. Now it was becoming clear that technology was going to be key driver in the customer’s decision to select one service provider over the other.
Fast forward almost two (2) decades later and we can see how critical and pervasive technology is to the Reverse Logistics & Aftermarket Services industry. From ERP & SCM solutions to mobility, to planning & forecasting, to remote monitoring, it is hard to fathom a service business without technology. Indeed, even customers of service providers evaluate their vendors based on the vendor’s adoption of advanced technology. In the past, IT systems were utilized primarily as a control mechanism to store and retrieve data related to costs. Now they are used to enhance the customer experience. Case in point, business travelers, such as myself, who prefer to use Hertz for car rental due to ease of check in/out enabled through the use of advanced technology solutions such as electronic signage and handheld mobile devices.
Yet, it still amazes me that there are many companies in the Aftermarket Service Industry who still don’t understand this point. Even though industry research shows that IT System functionality is a key criterion in evaluating and selecting service providers, many service providers are still laggards in their use of advanced technology.
Despite the fact that many of these companies are losing business or not getting their fair share of new business due to gaps in their systemic infrastructure, many are in denial that this is even a problem at all. Instead they chalk up their lost sale to a more aggressive competitor or a Not Invented Here (N-I-H) syndrome of the customer. Worse still are those companies who realize they need new system functionality but postpone the decision to invest their own capital preferring instead to find a customer who can generate enough cash flow to fund this project. Not likely!
The fact of the matter is that Reverse Logistics and Aftermarket Service of today has become a technology intensive business as we had prognosticated a long time ago. Most people would think it ludicrous if an OEM did not invest in new technology to design and build better products, or to retool its manufacturing plants. A manufacturer would lose market share or eventually go out of business if this were the case. So why should this be any different for service providers? It is critical for service providers to understand that system functionality is part of the value proposition and mix of capabilities that customers require in a vendor. Customers are smart and can quickly judge a service providers capabilities based on assessment of the provider’s IT infrastructure. Service providers need to think of IT as an extension of their service offering.
Let’s make 2010 the year of advanced technology deployments in the Reverse Logistics & Aftermarket Service Industry. My goal in future blog posts will be to provide you with the expertise and know-how to evaluate, select, and deploy new technology to take your service business to the next level.
The Reverse Logistics Industry has evolved so much in
this last decade. Back in the early 2000s, Reverse Logistics (RL)
was considered to be a “new frontier” of opportunity. Although there was a general recognition that Reverse
Logistics was an important part of the supply chain, much of the focus of
attention was on defining what activities and functions comprised the Reverse
Logistics Supply Chain (RLSC). Basically, the emphasis was on understanding the
basics of the RLSC: 1) how it worked, 3) key touch points and stake-holders,
and 4) critical challenges and pitfalls. Many RL professionals refer to this level of
knowledge as “RL 1.0”.
By the mid part of this decade, the knowledge of RLSCs expanded.
The focus of RL 2.0 was on making RLSCs work better and more efficiently. This meant understanding the true costs of the
RL value chain and finding ways to improve it by either streamlining or
re-engineering processes, implementing new systems to automate functions and
track key data about the supply chain, or outsource/out-tasks critical
functions to more efficient vendors. Prior
to 2.0, the conventional wisdom was that the RLSC was characterized with uncertainty.
As RLSCs evolved, we learned that there
was indeed some predictability and certainty to events. In RL 2.0 we learned not only how to track and
control the receipt of these incoming products but we also learned that there were also
multiple options for the back end processing of these items ranging from
replenishment of the returned good into the forward supply chain, to repair
first then replenish, to liquidate as is, to destroy and recycle, to any other
flavor in between.
I believe the industry has now entered the realm of RL
3.0. Here the focus is on managing disparate RL functions on an integrated
basis and adopting a more customer centric view of the RLSC. The
fact that there are so many different inbound and outbound RL processes means
that even more focus is needed to ensure maximum productivity and quality while minimizing
cost and time associated with these activities. The fact that products in the
RLSC may be purchased for consumption by other types of buyers down the line also
means that we have to focus on meeting customer requirement and achieving high
levels of customer satisfaction while earning a profit. 3.0 is about managing multiple and often
conflicting business objectives of the RLSC.
In other words, RL 3.0 is about optimization. In contrast, 2.0 was focused on cost control
and cost reduction.
Optimization in the true sense involves real-time,
dynamic planning. Today, most attempts at optimization are manual based and simply
involve business rules which prioritize the flow of goods in to various
back-end channels (e.g., liquidation, replenish, etc.). Unfortunately, most companies lack the proper
tools and technology to attain real optimization. This first requires an investment
in the proper systemic infrastructure to capture the information necessary for
real-time data management. Unfortunately, many companies have not been able to
build a business case for even this type of investment.
All too often, RL professionals talk about improvements
from a cost saving perspective making comments like “these improvements won’t
increase profits but they will reduce costs and offset losses”. This seems to meet the definition of a
“profit increase”. All too often,
executives and managers responsible for RL often ask question “why doesn’t my company
get it?” It is difficult to expect the
C-Suite to get excited about RL when improvements are described as isolated events
affecting the operating budget of a single department. C-level executives will look at each incremental
cost saving as nothing more than round off errors on the company’s income
statement. Instead, RL professionals
need to speak about these improvements as an integrated set of activities that impact
the company’s bottom line in and multiple stake holders in a significant way. This
will get the C-suite to take notice. These
conversations will all part of the RL 3.0 programming language and just like the older versions of RL, the
development, roll-out, and adoption of 3.0 will depend on the efforts of RL
professionals like you. Are you ready
for RL 3.0?